In this section you will find a dual analysis of the United States as both a system of war and as a potential foundation for peace.

While the U.S. can be seen as the site of a large scale economic, military and repressive war on humans, other species and the earth, it is also a society full of energy for change. Active citizens offer continued resistance to this established order as well as constructive movements to build a more peaceful, equitable, sustainable and caring future.

Recent Reports and Commentary
Updated 4.09.04




New Bush Space Policy Unveiled, Stresses U.S. Freedom of Action

Death Penalty: Latest Worldwide Statistics Released by Amnesty
Internatonal


By abolishing the death penalty in law or practice over half the
countries in the world have set the path for the remaining states who
continue to violate the right to life, said Amnesty International today.

Read the rest of the story>


Amnesty: China, Iran and U.S. Top World Executioners
April 6, 2004

China, Iran, the United States and Vietnam were the world's top users of
the death penalty in 2003, accounting for 84 % of known executions, human
rights body Amnesty International said Tuesday.

Read the rest of the story>




POLICE POWERS
5th Circuit erodes right against unreasonable search
April 6, 2004, Houston Chronicle, Editorial

In an era of war and terror, Americans' civil rights are threatened on
every side. Government agents can pry into a citizen's library, financial
and other personal records without a warrant and without telling the
citizen.

Read the rest of the story>


The terrible toll of racism in the U.S.

By Sharon Smith, March 19, 2004; Socialist Worker

HALF OF all Black men in New York City canÕt find a job, while Black teenage unemployment stands at 37 percent nationwide. These statistics show a crisis among Black Americans that should be setting off alarm bells in election year 2004. Yet even John Kerry, the candidate whose partyÕs voting base includes the vast majority of Blacks, has issued barely a sound bite.
Read the rest of the story>


Free Market Debunked
By Thom Hartmann, AlterNet
March 17, 2004

Here are a couple of headlines for those who haven't had the time to study both economics and history:

1. There is no such thing as a "free market."

2. The "middle class" is the creation of government intervention in the marketplace, and wouldn't exist without it (as millions of Americans and Europeans are discovering).

Read the rest of the story>


Corporations Are Insane
By Ross Crockford, AlterNet
January 29, 2004

Enron. WorldCom. Bechtel. Halliburton. To the cheerleaders on MSNBC and in The Wall Street Journal, such deceitful, profiteering companies are a few "bad apples" in a healthy economic barrel, as rare as a murderer in a convent. But a new documentary that premiered at the Sundance festival film last week argues that these rogue companies aren't the exception, they're the rule.

Read the rest of the story>


 

HEBRON: The fence beside our door
by Art Gish
CPTnet (Christian Peacemaker Teams) January 26, 2004
Israeli Apartheid: Jewish settlers' ethnic 'purification' of Hebron

Just over a year ago, on Christmas day, 2002, Israeli soldiers constructed a high fence and gate on our street right beside our door in Hebron, cutting off access to Shuhada Street for us and everyone else in the Chicken Market.

We then had to walk two blocks north to get to Shuhada Street and come back down the street to walk south on that street from our apartment.

Members of our Christian Peacemaker Team wondered what the meaning of that barrier was in the larger picture of what was happening in Hebron.

Now we have a clearer understanding. That tall fence and gate outside our door is part of the wall being built all around the West Bank, walling in (imprisoning) most of the Palestinian people into small areas (cantons or reservations), and at the same time taking about half of the West Bank. The Palestinian land on the outside of the wall is becoming Israeli land.

Read the rest of the story>


 

Where's the Apology? by Paul Krugman
Published on Friday, January 30, 2004 by the New York Times

George Bush promised to bring honor and integrity back to the White House. Instead, he got rid of accountability.

Surely even supporters of the Iraq war must be dismayed by the administration's reaction to David Kay's recent statements. Iraq, he now admits, didn't have W.M.D., or even active programs to produce such weapons. Those much-ridiculed U.N. inspectors were right. (But Hans Blix appears to have gone down the memory hole. On Tuesday Mr. Bush declared that the war was justified - under U.N. Resolution 1441, no less - because Saddam "did not let us in.")

So where are the apologies? Where are the resignations? Where is the investigation of this intelligence debacle? All we have is bluster from Dick Cheney, evasive W.M.D.-related-program-activity language from Mr. Bush - and a determined effort to prevent an independent inquiry.

Read the rest of the story>



With a Whisper, Not a Bang
Bush signs parts of Patriot Act II into law — stealthily.
By David Martin,  The San Antonio Current, Wednesday 24 December 2003

  On December 13, when U.S. forces captured Saddam Hussein, President George W. Bush not only celebrated with his national security team, but also pulled out his pen and signed into law a bill that grants the FBI sweeping new powers. A White House spokesperson explained the curious timing of the signing - on a Saturday - as "the President signs bills seven days a week." But the last time Bush signed a bill into law on a Saturday happened more than a year ago - on a spending bill that the President needed to sign, to prevent shuttng down the federal government the following Monday.

Read the rest of the article>


By David Walsh
3 January 2004

The new year began in the US under conditions of an unparalleled mobilization of police, army and federal law enforcement agents in major urban centers. Alleging a heightened threat of terrorist attacks and operating under the Department of Homeland Security’s “Orange Alert,” the Bush administration undertook measures such as were never seen during the Second World War or at the height of the Cold War.

Major events scheduled for New Year’s Eve and New Year’s Day took place under bizarre circumstances. Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge declared that Americans “need to go out and celebrate New Year’s,” even as he banned flights over New York City, Chicago and Las Vegas and ordered Black Hawk military helicopters to hover over Manhattan’s Times Square, where some 750,000 people gathered to welcome in the new year, the Las Vegas strip, and the Rose Bowl football game in Pasadena, California.

Snipers manned the rooftops over Times Square, while New York streets and its harbor were flooded with thousands of police, including many plainclothes officers. Bomb-sniffing dogs were on duty in New York and counter-terror units carried equipment to detect chemical, biological or radiological contamination.

Read the rest of the article>


Christmas Truce of 1914:
A little peace in the Great War

By Luke Harding; Berlin; November 12, 2003

A new book by a German historian has cast fresh light on one of the most extraordinary episodes of World War I and revealed that the celebrated 1914 Christmas truce took place because many of the Germans stationed on the front had worked in England.
The book, Der Kleine Frieden im Grossen Krieg, or The Small Peace in the Great War, shows that the German and British soldiers who famously played football with each other in No Man's Land on Christmas Day 1914 did not always have a ball. Sometimes they kicked around a lump of straw tied together with string, or even an empty jam box.
According to previously unseen letters and diaries sent home by Germans, the soldiers used sticks of wood, their caps and steel helmets as goalposts. The games lasted about an hour. The sleep-deprived players then collapsed, exhausted.
The book, by German author Michael Jurgs, is the first to be written from a German perspective about the impromptu Christmas ceasefire that spread across the Western Front - in defiance of official orders and to the horror of the British high command - five months after the outbreak of war.

Read the rest of the article>


 

Iraq through the American looking glass
By Robert Fisk in Baghdad
The IndependentDecember 26, 2003
 
Something very unpleasant is being let loose in Iraq. Just this week, a company commander in the US 1st Infantry Division in the north of the country admitted that, in order to elicit information about the guerrillas who are killing American troops, it was necessary to "instill fear" in the local villagers. An Iraqi interpreter working for the Americans had just taken an old lady from her home to frighten her daughters and grand-daughters into believing that she was being arrested.

Read the rest of the article>


A model of rectitude -- that's us
By Molly Ivins; Monday, Dec 29, 2003

Well! I am certainly glad to see that we are telling off the French, Germans and Russians.
I couldn't agree more with the Bush administration that those treacherous, undependable countries should be punished for their past cooperation with Saddam Hussein by being shut out of the $18.6 billion in Iraqi reconstruction contracts. No contracts for quislings!
Someone's got to uphold standards of morality and purity, and who better than us? As the president so often reminds us, this is a fight between good and evil.

Read the rest of the article>


 

We Caught The Wrong Guy
  By William Rivers Pitt
  t r u t h o u t | Perspective
Monday 15 December 2003

  Saddam Hussein, former employee of the American federal government, was captured near a farmhouse in Tikrit in a raid performed by other employees of the American federal government. That sounds pretty deranged, right? Perhaps, but it is also accurate. The unifying thread binding together everyone assembled at that Tikrit farmhouse is the simple fact that all of them – the soldiers as well as Hussein – have received pay from the United States for services rendered.

  It is no small irony that Hussein, the Butcher of Baghdad, the monster under your bed lo these last twelve years, was paid probably ten thousand times more during his time as an American employee than the soldiers who caught him on Saturday night. The boys in the Reagan White House were generous with your tax dollars, and Hussein was a recipient of their largesse for the better part of a decade.

Read the rest of the story>


 

ABC Narrows the Field: Did Kucinich's Criticism of Koppel Influence Decision?

Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, 12/11/03

NEW YORK - December 11 - A day after ABC's Ted Koppel moderated a debate between the Democratic presidential contenders, the network decided to withdraw three off-air producers from the campaigns of Dennis Kucinich, Carol Moseley Braun and Rev. Al Sharpton.

ABC's decision was attributed to the fact that these candidates are perceived to have a slim chance of winning the Democratic nomination. An ABC spokesperson explained (Boston Globe, 12/11/03) that "as we prepare for Iowa and New Hampshire, we are putting more resources toward covering those events." Appearing on CNBC with Kucinich (12/10/03), Time reporter Jay Carney suggested that the decision could be due to the fact that "all of the media organizations have limited resources. It's actually, I think, pretty impressive that they had somebody on your campaign day by day by day."

Somehow it's hard to believe that the "limited resources" of the Disney corporation (2003 revenues: $27 billion) explains ABC's call. ABC's decision does seem to mirror the opinions of Koppel, who seemed frustrated that these candidates were included in the debate at all. According to the New York Times (12/7/03), Koppel "said he would have preferred a slugfest among the six leading candidates." Koppel was quoted: "You can't have a debate among nine people.... There is no such thing. It's called a food fight."

"How did Dennis Kucinich and Al Sharpton and Carol Moseley Braun get into this thing?" Koppel was quoted in the Washington Post (12/10/03). "Nobody seems to know. Some candidates who are perceived as serious are gasping for air, and what little oxygen there is on the stage will be taken up by one-third of the people who do not have a snowball's chance in hell of winning the nomination."

Read the rest of the story>


Cluster bombs kill in Iraq, even after shooting ends
By Paul Wiseman, USA TODAY 12/10/03

BAGHDAD — The little canisters dropped onto the city, white ribbons trailing behind. They clattered into streets, landed in lemon trees, rattled around on roofs, settled onto lawns.

When Jassim al-Qaisi saw the canisters the size of D batteries falling on his neighborhood just before 7 a.m. April 7, he laughed and asked himself: "Now what are the Americans throwing on our heads?" (Interactive graphic: How a cluster bomb works and more)

The strange objects were fired by U.S. artillery outside Baghdad as U.S. forces approached the Iraqi capital. In the span of a few minutes, they would kill four civilians in the al-Dora neighborhood of southern Baghdad and send al-Qaisi's teenage son to the hospital with metal fragments in his foot.

The deadly objects were cluster bomblets, small explosives packed by the dozens or hundreds into bombs, rockets or artillery shells known as cluster weapons. When these weapons were fired on Baghdad on April 7, many of the bomblets failed to explode on impact. They were picked up or stumbled on by their victims.

Read the rest of the story>


Americans who are fundamentally misinformed about 9/11 provide the bulk of those tallied in polls as supporting Bush and the Iraq war. Subtract them from polls and Bush is an unpopular president -- widely seen as having accomplished a bait and switch, redirecting U.S. anger and vengeance toward a country that did not attack us.

The run-up to the Iraq war offers a case study in news bias: how mainstream media, especially television, were incapable of getting the truth out in the face of administration lies and innuendo about Iraq's 9/11 role and weapons of mass destruction.

Read the rest of the story>

 


Troop Families Go to Iraq on Peace Mission

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published: November 29, 2003

SAN DIEGO (AP) -- Relatives of U.S. service members said they were nervous but hopeful Saturday as they embarked on a private peace mission to Iraq, where they will bring their message of friendship and doubts about the war.

The leader of the 10-member group, Fernando Suarez del Solar, said it is important for Iraqis to realize that not all Americans support the U.S. military presence in Iraq. His son, Marine Lance Cpl. Jesus Suarez del Solar, 20, was killed in Iraq eight months ago when he stepped on an unexploded American cluster bomb.

Read the rest of the story>


Conserving Racism: The Greening of Hate at Home and Abroad
By Betsy Hartmann 12/10/03

The greening of hate - blaming environmental degradation on poor populations of color - is once again on the rise, both in the U.S. and overseas. In the U.S., its illogic runs like this: immigrants are the main cause of overpopulation, and overpopulation in turn causes urban sprawl, the destruction of wilderness, pollution, and so forth.

Internationally, it draws on narratives that blame expanding populations of peasants and herders for encroaching on pristine nature.

In the first instance, the main policy ‘solution’ is immigration restriction; in the second it is coercive conservation, the violent exclusion of local communities from nature preserves. Both varieties of the greening of hate are about policing borders. By stressing the negative role of population growth, both target poor women’s fertility as the fundamental root of environmental evil.

In the U.S. the first big greening of hate wave occurred in the mid-1990s when conservative anti-immigrant forces began mobilizing within the Sierra Club, the nation’s largest membership-based environmental organization, to pass a ballot initiative supporting a “reduction of net immigration” as a component of a “comprehensive population policy for the United States.” An opposing coalition of environmental justice, immigrant rights, and reproductive rights advocates successfully challenged the initiative, and it was voted down in 1998.

Read the rest of the story>

 


U.S. Sees Evidence of Overcharging in Iraq Contract
by Douglas Jehl, 12/12.03, New York Times

Pentagon investigation has found evidence that a subsidiary of the politically connected Halliburton Company overcharged the government by as much as $61 million for fuel delivered to Iraq under huge no-bid reconstruction contracts, senior military officials said Thursday.

Read the rest of the story>


Hogtied and Abused at Fort Benning
by Kathy Kelly
November 27, 2003        

On Sunday, November 23, I took part in a nonviolent civil disobedience action at Fort Benning, GA, to protest the U.S. Army´s School of the Americas (SOA, now called the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation – WHISC) Shortly after more than two dozen of us entered Fort Benning and were arrested, US Military Police took us to a warehouse on the base for "processing." I was directed to a station for an initial search, where a woman soldier began shouting at me to look straight ahead and spread my legs. I turned to ask her why she was shouting at me and was ordered to keep my mouth shut, look straight ahead, and spread my legs wider. She then began an aggressive body search. When ordered to raise one leg a second time, I temporarily lost my balance while still being roughly searched and, in my view, ‘womanhandled.’ I decided that I shouldn’t go along with this dehumanizing action any longer. When I lowered my arms and said, quietly, "I’m sorry, but I can’t any longer cooperate with this," I was instantly pushed to the floor. Five soldiers squatted around me, one of them referring to me with an expletive (this f_ _ _ er) and began to cuff my wrists and ankles and then bind my wrists and ankles together. Then one soldier leaned on me, with his or her knee in my back. Unable to get a full breath, I gasped and moaned, "I can’t breathe." I repeated this many times and then began begging for help. When I said, "Please, I’ve had four lung collapses before," the pressure on my back eased. Four soldiers then carried me, hogtied, to the next processing station for interrogation and propped me in a kneeling position. The soldier standing to my left, who had been assigned to "escort" me, gently told me that soon the ankle and wrist cuffs, which were very tight, would be cut off. He politely let me know that he would have to move my hair, which was hanging in front of my face, so that my picture could be taken. I told him I’d appreciate that.

Read the rest of the story>


The Miami Model
Paramilitaries, Embedded Journalists and Illegal Protests. Think This is Iraq? It's Your Country
By Jeremy Scahill
 
MIAMI--We were loading our video equipment into the trunk of our car when a fleet of bicycle cops sped up and formed a semi-circle around us. The lead cop was none other than Miami Police Chief John Timoney. The former Police Commissioner of Philadelphia Timoney has a reputation for brutality and hatred of protesters of any kind. He calls them "punks," "knuckleheads" and a whole slew of expletives. He coordinated the brutal police response to the mass-protests at the Republican National Convention in Philadelphia in 2000. After a brief stint in the private sector, Timoney took the post of Miami police chief as part of Mayor Manny Diaz's efforts to "clean up the department."
 
We had watched him the night before on the local news in Miami praising his men for the restraint they had shown in the face of violent anarchists intent on destroying the city. In reality, the tens of thousands who gathered in Miami to protest the ministerial meetings of the Free Trade Area of the Americas summit were seeking to peacefully demonstrate against what they consider to be a deadly expansion of NAFTA and US-led policies of free trade. There were environmental groups, labor unions, indigenous activists from across the hemisphere, church groups, grassroots organizations, students and many others in the streets. What they encountered as they assembled outside the gates to the building housing the FTAA talks was nothing short of a police riot. It only took a few hours last Thursday before downtown Miami looked like a city under martial law.

Read the rest of the story>


U.S.= Champion of Democracy?
51 Dictators Supported by U.S. - a hyperlinked list with footnotes

Read the article

 

 

 

Recent Reports & Commentary

War & Peace Collection

Justice Collection

Ecology Collection